Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.21.1904021007150.17899@lancre
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
List pgsql-hackers
>> For pg_checksums, probably some improvement patch will be submitted later,
>> if someone feels like it.
>
> Let's see.  I think that what we have now in v12 is good enough for
> checksum operations on an offline cluster.  And my take is that we
> should focus more on online checksum verification for v13 and future
> versions.

I agree.

For online, we should want throttling so that the check can have a reduced 
performance impact when scrubbing.

-- 
Fabien.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jamison, Kirk"
Date:
Subject: RE: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs