Bonjour Michaël,
>> Here is an attempt at improving the Notes. [...]
>
> So, the ordering of the notes for each paragraph is as follows: 1)
> Replication issues when mixing different checksum setups across nodes.
> 2) Consistency of the operations if killed. 3) Don't start Postgres
> while the operation runs.
>
> Your proposal is to switch the order of the paragraphs to 3), 1) and
> then 2).
Yes. I suggest to emphasize cluster corruption risks by putting them
first.
> Do others have any opinion? I am fine with the current
> order of things, still it may make sense to tweaks the docs.
>
> In the paragraph related to replication, the second statement is
> switched to be first so as the docs warn first, and then give
> recommendations.
Yep.
> This part makes sense.
Yep!
> I am not sure that "checksum status" is a correct term. It seems to
> me that "same configuration for data checksums as before the tool ran"
> or something like that would be more correct.
Possibly, I cannot say.
--
Fabien.
