Hello Kyotaro-san,
> On such standpoint, the first hunk in the patch attracted my
> eyes.
>
> <term><literal>host</literal></term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> - Name of host to connect to.<indexterm><primary>host name</primary></indexterm>
> - If a host name begins with a slash, it specifies Unix-domain
> - communication rather than TCP/IP communication; the value is the
> - name of the directory in which the socket file is stored.
> + </para>
>
> I don't think this is user-friendly since almost all of them don't write
> multiple hosts there. So I prefer the previous organization.
ISTM that specifying the expected syntax is the first information needed?
The previous organization says "this is a host name (bla bla bla) btw I
lied at the beginning this is a list".
> The description about IP-address looks too verbose, especially we don't
> need explain what is IP-address here.
Ok.
I agree that the order is not the best possible one. Here is a simplified
and reordered version:
""" Comma-separated list of hosts to connect to. Each item may be a host
name that will be resolved with a look-up, a numeric IP address that will
be used directly, or the name of a directory which contains the socket
file for Unix-domain communication, if the specification begins with a
slash. Each specified target will be tried in turn in the order given. See
<xref linkend="libpq-multiple-hosts"/> for details. """
What do you think about that version.
--
Fabien.
