Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.21.1812281644350.6632@lancre
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT  (Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT  (Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> At first i also try to do it like that but it seems the function will
> became long and more complex to me

Probably. But calling it with size 100 should result in the same behavior, 
so it is really just an extension of the preceeding one? Or am I missing 
something?

-- 
Fabien.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Poor buildfarm coverage of strong-random alternatives
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: removal of dangling temp tables