Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.21.1812251855370.32444@lancre
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums  (Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>)
Responses Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I think MB indeed makes more sense than kB, so I have changed that now 
> in V7, per attached.

You use 1024² bytes. What about 1000000 bytes per MB, as the unit is about 
stored files?

Also, you did not answer to my other points:
  - use "instr_time.h" for better precision
  - invert sizeonly
  - reuse a test

-- 
Fabien.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature: triggers on materialized views
Next
From: Mitar
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature: triggers on materialized views