Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.21.1810221003590.3819@lancre
Whole thread Raw
In response to Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Michaël,

> The first failure is unrelated to the involved commits, as they touched
> completely different areas of the code:
>  INSERT INTO hash_split_heap SELECT a/2 FROM generate_series(1, 25000) a;
> + WARNING:  buffer refcount leak: [6481] (rel=base/16384/32349, blockNum=156, flags=0x93800000, refcount=1 1)
>
> And versions older than HEAD do not complain.
>
> Any thoughts?

Both animals use gcc experimental versions, which may rather underline a 
new bug in gcc head rather than an existing issue in pg. Or not.

-- 
Fabien.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: View to get all the extension control file details