Hello Steven,
There were some hesitations when developing this feature for 9.6, with a
transition from starting from 0 to 1 on submission v9, without clear
outside input in the discussion to which was better, if any.
The rational for starting from 1 in the stdout report is that I felt, and
still feel, that it is more user/human friendly this way.
The 0-numbering for the log was pre-existing and as tools/scripts exist to
process that, changing it is best avoided, and it is for machines anyway.
So my 0.02€:
IMO the minimum fuss is to let it as a feature, which it is, and just
explicitely document it, so I'm on Tom's line here. See attached patch as
an attempt to do that. Could be backpatched up to 9.6.
I could also be okay with starting from 0 as well, sure, but I like
human-friendlyness so I would not bother.
>> So possibly we could resolve it by using 0-based numbering in the
>> human-readable output, but that would confuse things too perhaps.
>>
>> Maybe we should just document it.
>
> Changing the human readable log, plus documentation, might be fair game
> for a new major version. If so, I think the only changes required are:
Sure.
--
Fabien.
