Hello Robert,
> Mmph. I understand the desire to identify the exact commit used for a
> build somehow, but something whose output depends on whether or not I
> left a branch lying around locally doesn't seem that great.
Indeed, the branch/tag search might have a little strange behavior.
Probably you would be more happy with just the commit (--always) & knowing
that it was changed (--dirty).
sh> git describe --always --dirty b81eba6
sh> vi README # edit
sh> git describe --always --dirty b81eba6-dirty
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
