Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.20.1709221950480.5840@lancre
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure
List pgsql-hackers
> [...] After another week of buildfarm runs, we have a few more cases of 
> 3 rows of output, and none of more than 3 or less than 1.  So I went 
> ahead and pushed your patch.  I'm still suspicious of these results, but 
> we might as well try to make the buildfarm green pending investigation 
> of how this is happening.

Yep. I keep the issue of pgbench tap test determinism in my todo list, 
among other things.

I think that it should be at least clearer under which condition (load ? 
luck ? bug ?) the result may be 1 or 3 when 2 are expected, which needs 
some thinking.

-- 
Fabien.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] additional contrib test suites
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH]make pg_rewind to not copy useless WAL files