Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys afterinitialization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys afterinitialization
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.20.1709211012030.30340@lancre
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys afterinitialization  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Masahiko-san,

>> ISTM that you probably intended "\(.*\)" (actual parenthesis) instead of
>> "(.*)" (memorization) in the data generation message check.
>
> Thank you, fixed it.
>
>> Otherwise all is well for me.
>>
>
> Attached the updated version patch.

Applies, compiles, make check & tap test ok, doc is fine.

All is well for me: the feature is useful, code is simple and clean, it is 
easy to invoke, easy to extend as well, which I'm planning to do once it 
gets in.

I switched the patch to "Ready for Committers". No doubt they will have 
their own opinions about it. Let's wait and see.

Thanks,

-- 
Fabien.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed