Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.20.1704240859200.2912@lancre
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes  (Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>)
List pgsql-hackers
> To sum up:
>
> - I agree to add a generic command TestLib & a wrapper in PostgresNode,
>   instead of having pgbench specific things in the later, then call
>   them from pgbench test script.
>
> - I still think that moving the pgbench scripts inside the test script
>   is a bad idea (tm).

Here is a v2 along those lines.

I have also separated some basic test which do not need a server running, 
as done in other tap tests.

-- 
Fabien.
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker