Hello Rafia,
> Well with this new approach, the example you gave previously for better
> readability:
>
>> \set bid
>> CASE WHEN random(0, 99) < 85
>> THEN :tbid
>> ELSE :abid + (:abid >= :tbid)
>> END
>
> will give error at the first line.
Indeed you are right for the patch I sent, but it is ok if the initial
state is COEX, i.e. it does not allow an empty expression.
> In general, this new approach is likely to create confusions in such
> cases.
See attached version.
> As an end-user one needs to be real careful to check what portions have
> to split between lines. Keeping this in mind, I'd prefer the previous
> approach.
I will not fight over this one. I like it in "scala", though, and I find
it rather elegant, especially as backslashes are quite ugly.
Another reason not to take it is that it would be much harder to have that
in psql as well.
--
Fabien.
