Hello Peter,
>> number of transactions per client: 1000
>> -latency average = 15.844 ms
>> +latency average: 15.844 ms
>> tps = 618.764555 (including connections establishing)
>
> I think what you have here is that colons separate input parameters and
> equal signs separate result output. So I think it's OK the way it is.
Hmmm... Then other measures displayed are not all consistent with this
theory.
Also there is still the bug under -t which displays a 0 latency.
The attached patch still fixes that and make it consistent the other way
around, i.e. by using "=" for latency. I switched to use ":" for weight
which is an input parameter. I let ":" when there is a long sentence to
describe the figure displayed, more on aesthetical grounds.
> Maybe a better improvement would be introducing section headings like
> "test parameters" and "test results".
This would add more lines to the report, to sure how desirable it is.
--
Fabien.
