>> I've left out:
>> - removing -N/-S upward compatibility shorthands
>> but I will not cry if they are removed
>
> I see no particular merit to breaking backward compatibility here.
I agree, but I would not fight for this. I think there is a good argument
*NOT* to add more if new builtin scripts are added later.
Currently the builtin script can be selected with "-b t" (t for tcpb-like),
"-b s" (s for simple-update) and "-b se" (se for select-only).
I've reused their current names for the option selector, and it takes the
first matching prefix.
--
Fabien.
