Hello Robert,
> Done.
Great!
> I removed some of the new error-reporting stuff because (1) I wasn't
> sure it was right
Hmmm. Although I'm not sure it was right, I'm sure that not enough error
reporting is too rough:
sh> ./pgbench -f bad.sql syntax error at column 25 set: parse error
> and (2) it touched more places than just the ones directly relevant to
> the patch.
It just tried to report errors consistently from all places.
> I think those things can be resubmitted as a separate patch,
Yep, I'll do that.
> but I'd like to have a more robust discussion about what we want the
> error reporting to look like rather than just sliding it into this
> patch.
As an input, I suggest that the error reporting feature should provide a
clue about where the issue is, including a line number and possibly the
offending line. Not sure what else is needed.
--
Fabien.
