> The makefile changes in this do not look right to me. Files that are
> meant to be shipped in the tarball should be removed by make
> maintainer-clean, not an ordinary "make clean" which is what the committed
> patch appears to do. Otherwise, a tarball user without bison installed
> would be cut off at the knees if he did "make clean" or "make distclean";
> but those operations are not supposed to remove files that were in the
> tarball.
Ooops, sorry, I'm probably responsible for the wrong EXTRA_CLEAN. I
definitely did not consider that clean was expected to leave the directory
to be compilable without flex/bison.
--
Fabien.
