On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rainer Mager wrote:
> The data should be mostly ordered by date. It is all logged in semi-realtime
> such that 99% will be logged within an hour of the timestamp. Also, as
> stated above, during this query it was about 1.2 MB/s, which I know isn't
> great. I admit this isn't the best hardware in the world, but I would expect
> better than that for linear queries.
Might you have an unbalanced index tree? Reindexing would also solve that
problem.
Matthew
--
There are only two kinds of programming languages: those people always
bitch about and those nobody uses. (Bjarne Stroustrup)
