Re: file system and raid performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From david@lang.hm
Subject Re: file system and raid performance
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.1.10.0808042201010.22058@asgard.lang.hm
Whole thread Raw
In response to file system and raid performance  ("Mark Wong" <markwkm@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: file system and raid performance
Re: file system and raid performance
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Mark Wong wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We've thrown together some results from simple i/o tests on Linux
> comparing various file systems, hardware and software raid with a
> little bit of volume management:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/HP_ProLiant_DL380_G5_Tuning_Guide
>
> What I'd like to ask of the folks on the list is how relevant is this
> information in helping make decisions such as "What file system should
> I use?"  "What performance can I expect from this RAID configuration?"
> I know these kind of tests won't help answer questions like "Which
> file system is most reliable?" but we would like to be as helpful as
> we can.
>
> Any suggestions/comments/criticisms for what would be more relevant or
> interesting also appreciated.  We've started with Linux but we'd also
> like to hit some other OS's.  I'm assuming FreeBSD would be the other
> popular choice for the DL-380 that we're using.
>
> I hope this is helpful.

it's definantly timely for me (we were having a spirited 'discussion' on
this topic at work today ;-)

what happened with XFS?

you show it as not completing half the tests in the single-disk table and
it's completly missing from the other ones.

what OS/kernel were you running?

if it was linux, which software raid did you try (md or dm) did you use
lvm or raw partitions?

David Lang

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Mark Wong"
Date:
Subject: file system and raid performance
Next
From: "Gregory S. Youngblood"
Date:
Subject: Re: file system and raid performance