On Tue, 24 May 2011, Marc-Andr? Laverdi?re wrote:
> It is not over... It is not in the CVS repository yet :D
>
> What would be the next step?
It was not clear to me that the discussion between you and Craig had
resulted in a final code version. Apparently you think so. Craig do you
concur? If so I'll take a look at it and see about committing it.
> My guess is that we need to update the testware for it. That sounds like
> a tricky proposition that would mess up a bunch of things here and
> there... Any ideas on how to do it best?
I don't think there's any good way to setup automated tests for things
like client certificates which need significant server configuration. So
I wouldn't bother with that. Perhaps some documentation updates would be
in order, but I haven't looked at the code yet to know what might be
appropriate.
Kris Jurka
