On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Robert Haas wrote:
> Regarding this item:
>
> * Consider reverting preventing regular users from base type creation
>
> You raise this point:
>
> tgl says: whether or not we think PL/Java is bulletproof, there are
> other problems, for instance this one
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/87zlnwnvjg.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
>
> That's a pretty overwhelming argument for leaving it as-is. I think
> we should remove this from the list of open items.
Yes, that makes sense to me as the original requester of this open item.
I thought it had been taken off a while ago.
Kris Jurka
