On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 08:58:22AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> I don't know if the omission to check for identical PERMISSIVE or
> RESTRICTIVE settings can lead to real problems, but I feel that it
> violates the promise of the function. So I am +1 on this change.
That does not make sense here, two policies with a different
polpermissive are not the same, or am I missing something?
That just looks like a hole coming from 093129c9d9fc where the field
has been added. Here is the thread related to this commit, without
the relcache part being mentioned:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160901063404.GY4028%40tamriel.snowman.net
--
Michael
