Re: Why sequential scan with index present? - Mailing list pgsql-cygwin

From Michael Labhard
Subject Re: Why sequential scan with index present?
Date
Msg-id akqqr5$ohl$1@main.gmane.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why sequential scan with index present?  ("Michael Labhard" <ince@pacifier.com>)
List pgsql-cygwin
Found answer somewhere on PostgreSQL web site:  optimizer uses sequential
scan anyway if the number of records are small.

-- Michael





pgsql-cygwin by date:

Previous
From: Jason Tishler
Date:
Subject: Re: PG on Win2K
Next
From: "Michael Labhard"
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL unsuitable for large datasets?