On 2026-Jun-18, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 11:33:23AM +0000, Hans Buschmann wrote:
> > I also can confirm that this silences the compiler warning of GCC 16.1.1.
>
> Thanks! I'm debating whether to back-patch this to unsupported branches.
> IIUC it qualifies. I'm getting ready to bump up the minimum supported
> version of pg_dump and friends to v10, so maybe I should stop there. But
> also, stopping at v14 might be good enough for something small like this.
> Any opinions?
I'd stop at 14 and call it a day. It doesn't prevent building, which is
IIRC the criteria we use for the older branches.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"You're _really_ hosed if the person doing the hiring doesn't understand
relational systems: you end up with a whole raft of programmers, none of
whom has had a Date with the clue stick." (Andrew Sullivan)
https://postgr.es/m/20050809113420.GD2768@phlogiston.dyndns.org
