On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 12:51:38PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am completely sure yet, but it looks like we will need to be smarter
> with the handling of the number of piped commands by tracking them
> across the syncs in the shape of a queue, or something like that? So
> it feels like we need to think harder about the tracking of this
> activity depending on the state of the pipeline we're in. Or we could
> lift some of these assertions, but that would not be right to me.
Hmm. Taking a step back this would be overcomplicating things. As
long as we are careful to consume the synced results still in a
pipeline, it looks like we should be fine. While digging into it, I
have found a third assertion that was triggerable with
available_results at the end of the pipeline, once I began mixing
\getresults with a deferred error.
This stuff is tricky enough that I may not have overseen all the
patterns possible, of course, at least this is progress.
Alexander, what do you think?
--
Michael
