On 2026-May-23, Kirill Reshke wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2026 at 22:18, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
> > I see two alternatives. One is to have pg_dump --binary-upgrade choose
> > a constraint name for the not-null with full knowledge of all other
> > constraint names, so that we know to generate a non conflicting one.
> > I suspect this is not easy to code.
>
> Well, for this option, we need to be told about what other constraint
> names that are about to be created.
Sure. Of course, pg_dump can run all the queries it needs to obtain
constraint names, so it's certainly doable.
> > The other is much simpler: make pg_upgrade -c warn you about the check
> > constraint name so that you know to rename it before the upgrade.
>
> I don't think this is good when the database asks you to change your
> DDL because of its internal troubles with something.
OK. I disagree but I'm not opposed if you want to do it the other way.
If you prefer that I write the patch, that's fine too.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La espina, desde que nace, ya pincha" (Proverbio africano)
