On Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 08:05:00AM +0800, Mingwei Jia wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for the clarification, and sorry for the noise.
>
> Attached is a tar.gz archive containing the 10 patch files as a single
> attachment, as suggested.
>
> The archive contains:
>
> umbra-rfc-v2-patches/0001-...
> ...
> umbra-rfc-v2-patches/0010-...
>
> This is the same RFC v2 patch set as before; only the delivery format is
> changed.
>
> SHA256:
>
> 2b47ef8e77d1860a2f652cc86a5d030f0bcbc466d5f0fbbf515b20b55835c4b7
Yes, I think that worked; the email had two parts, and the second part
was labeled correctly:
I 1 <no description> [text/plain, 8bit, utf-8, 0.4K]
A 2 umbra-rfc-v2-patches.tar.gz [applica/x-gzip, base64, 316K]
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
