Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance
Date
Msg-id af408ee101ce05f7b84e7397c67981a1@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Something ain't kosher. I tried the same test with the latest and greatest
DBI, DBD::Pg, and PostgreSQL, tuned everything up, and still got around
10,000 transactions per minute or so. There is no way MySQL is doing an
order of magnitude or more better than that and using properly transactioned
inserts.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200506022050
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCn6mavJuQZxSWSsgRAq4JAJ9SszAYi6i+RhhS0AQTLGr/+JqI6ACgk9Dj
3qXjrSk1nnh4vdnGmY/R3e0=
=kJkK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL call to get pid of current connection
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL call to get pid of current connection