On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 11:52:37AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW, I think it's totally fine if you say that you don't want to do the work
> to formulate performance improvement release note entries. It's a lot of work
> to curate the release notes, it makes sense to split the work up.
>
> It's just that the answer to proposing listing certain performance
> improvements shouldn't be that we don't include them as a matter of policy.
I am fine with listing anything, as long as it is effective and useful
to the reader. I explained in my recent email why I considered that to
be very hard for performance items, but with help I think it can be
achieved. New optimizer items are a good example --- we reference plan
types. I need help in how other items can have similar effectiveness.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
