Re: add types to index storage params on doc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: add types to index storage params on doc
Date
Msg-id aee5cdd8-1663-1eb3-eb29-a886fa9d5734@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to add types to index storage params on doc  (Atsushi Torikoshi <atorik@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: add types to index storage params on doc  (Atsushi Torikoshi <atorik@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 2020/03/16 11:09, Atsushi Torikoshi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The current manual on CREATE TABLE[1] describes storage
> parameters with their types.
> But manual on CREATE INDEX[2] describes storage parameters
> WITHOUT their types.
> 
> I think it'll be better to add types to storage parameters
> on CREATE INDEX for the consistency.
> 
> Attached a patch.
> Any thought?

Thanks for the patch! It basically looks good to me.

-    <term><literal>buffering</literal>
+    <term><literal>buffering</literal> (<type>string</type>)

Isn't it better to use "enum" rather than "string"?
In the docs about enum GUC parameters, "enum" is used there.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: backend type in log_line_prefix?