Re: shmget fails on OS X with proper settings - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Prashant Ranjalkar |
---|---|
Subject | Re: shmget fails on OS X with proper settings |
Date | |
Msg-id | ae3e48bc0705070438p65860755p5c1313efff19c799@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: shmget fails on OS X with proper settings ("Christopher S Martin" <martin.christopher.s@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: shmget fails on OS X with proper settings
|
List | pgsql-general |
Hi Chris,
Please let me know your shared_buffers & max_connections .
How much RAM your sstem has.
You have set up your shmmax to 12MB.
I hope these DB parameters have larger in values and stopping the allocating of shared memory segments during start up of the database.
if your system has enough memory then set the shmmax to highier value and try again.
Hope this will resolve your problem.
Regards,
Prashant Ranjalkar
EnterpriseDB
Please let me know your shared_buffers & max_connections .
How much RAM your sstem has.
You have set up your shmmax to 12MB.
I hope these DB parameters have larger in values and stopping the allocating of shared memory segments during start up of the database.
if your system has enough memory then set the shmmax to highier value and try again.
Hope this will resolve your problem.
Regards,
Prashant Ranjalkar
EnterpriseDB
On 5/7/07, Christopher S Martin <martin.christopher.s@gmail.com> wrote:
No .pid files found in the data directory.
The ipcs output doesn't list anything owned by the postgres user, or by root.
Thanks,
Chris
On 5/7/07, Prashant Ranjalkar < prashant.ranjalkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please check any .pid file exist in your data directory. If it exists then
> postmaster is running and memory is not freed up.
> Also check
> ipcs -mp
>
> it will give any shared memory allocated segments if any and consuming the
> memory.
>
> regards
> Prashant Ranjalkar
>
>
> On 5/7/07, Christopher S Martin < martin.christopher.s@gmail.com > wrote:
> > sysctl -a reveals the following:
> > kern.sysv.shmmax: 12582912
> > kern.sysv.shmmin : 1
> > kern.sysv.shmmni: 32
> > kern.sysv.shmseg: 8
> > kern.sysv.shmall: 1024
> > kern.sysv.semmni: 87381
> > kern.sysv.semmns: 87381
> > kern.sysv.semmnu: 87381
> > kern.sysv.semmsl : 87381
> > kern.sysv.semume: 10
> >
> > I am using the sysctl.conf file in /etc to set these values at boot
> > time, but in that file I only have the following entries:
> >
> > kern.sysv.shmmax=12582912
> > kern.sysv.shmmin=1
> > kern.sysv.shmmni=32
> > kern.sysv.shmseg=8
> > kern.sysv.shmall=1024
> >
> > When booting up in unix mode to view the output from all the startup
> > processes, I do notice that it looks like the sysctl values are read
> > and set twice, not sure if this would affect anything.
> >
> > I checked the process listing for any other postmaster processes that
> > could have been left running, but nothing it showing up. I'm using a
> > LaunchAgent to start postmaster, so it shouldn't be starting on its
> > own anyway.
> >
> > On 5/7/07, Prashant Ranjalkar < prashant.ranjalkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > The previously running postmaster process might not closed properly and
> > > released the kernel's memory.
> > > Check for any process running on the server if it exists then kill the
> > > process.here due to unrelease of kernel's memory and while booting the
> > > process is not releasing shared memory hence leading to problems.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Prashant Ranjalkar
> > > EnterpriseDB
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/7/07, Christopher S Martin < martin.christopher.s@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Martin:
> > > >
> > > > They didn't take any memory out of the machine. AS for memory cache
> > > > parameters, I'm don't know about that. How would I go checking for
> > > > that type of thing?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > > On 5/6/07, Martin Gainty < mgainty@hotmail.com > wrote:
> > > > > if you're getting memory errors then a guess would be did they take
> out
> > > any
> > > > > memory out of your machine or perhaps did they change your memory
> cache
> > > > > parameters???
> > > > > Martin
> > > > > This email message and any files transmitted with it contain
> > > confidential
> > > > > information intended only for the person(s) to whom this email
> message
> > > is
> > > > > addressed. If you have received this email message in error, please
> > > notify
> > > > > the sender immediately by telephone or email and destroy the
> original
> > > > > message without making a copy. Thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Christopher S Martin" < martin.christopher.s@gmail.com >
> > > > > To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 3:07 PM
> > > > > Subject: [GENERAL] shmget fails on OS X with proper settings
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi to the list, its my first post.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was previous running postgres 8.2.1 on my OS X 10.4.9 laptop
> with no
> > > > > > problems.
> > > > > > After I sent it to apple care, I found that I can no longer start
> the
> > > > > > postmaster daemon. When I try, I receive the standard shmget
> failed
> > > > > > error message:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FATAL: could not create shared memory segment: Cannot allocate
> memory
> > > > > > DETAIL: Failed system call was shmget(key=5432001, size=4112384,
> > > 03600).
> > > > > > HINT: This error usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a
> shared
> > > > > > memory segment exceeded available memory or swap space. To reduce
> the
> > > > > > request size (currently 4112384 bytes), reduce PostgreSQL's
> > > > > > shared_buffers parameter (currently 300) and/or its
> max_connections
> > > > > > parameter (currently 30).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I get this error with either the settings recommended on the
> kernel
> > > > > > resources page:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kern.sysv.shmmax=4194304
> > > > > > kern.sysv.shmmin=1
> > > > > > kern.sysv.shmmni=32
> > > > > > kern.sysv.shmseg=8
> > > > > > kern.sysv.shmall=1024
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And I also get it when i set kern.sysv.shmmax=12582912
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After making all these changed rebooting doesn't fix anything.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Has anyone ran into this problem, or has any idea as to why this
> would
> > > > > > start to fail so suddenly?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Chris
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------(end of
> > > broadcast)---------------------------
> > > > > > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------(end of
> > > broadcast)---------------------------
> > > > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
> >
>
>
pgsql-general by date: