On 22.08.25 07:09, Michael Paquier wrote:
> An extra thing is a suggested change for pg_nextpower2_32(), to use a
> uint64 instead of a uint32 as argument, which is caused by
> next_pow2_int64() and next_pow2_int(), that both used int64
> previously.
That seems highly confusing. What is the meaning of the "32" then?
If you need 64-bit behavior, use the variant with "64" in the name.
