Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From torikoshia
Subject Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom?
Date
Msg-id add1e591fbe8874107e75d04328859ec@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-03-26 17:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2021/03/26 0:33, torikoshia wrote:
>> On 2021-03-25 22:14, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> On 2021/03/23 16:32, torikoshia wrote:
>>>> On 2021-03-05 17:47, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for your comments!
>>> 
>>> Thanks for updating the patch!
>>> 
>>> PostgreSQL Patch Tester reported that the patched version failed to 
>>> be compiled
>>> at Windows. Could you fix this issue?
>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.131238
>>> 
>> 
>> It seems PGDLLIMPORT was necessary..
>> Attached a new one.
> 
> Thanks for updating the patch!
> 
> In my test, generic_calls for a utility command was not incremented
> before PL/pgSQL function was executed. Maybe this is expected behavior.
> But it was incremented after the function was executed. Is this a bug?
> Please see the following example.

Thanks for reviewing!

It's a bug and regrettably it seems difficult to fix it during this
commitfest.

Marked the patch as "Withdrawn".


Regards,



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: shared memory stats: high level design decisions: consistency, dropping