Re: Adding locks statistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Adding locks statistics
Date
Msg-id adNUBGqGK2YB1azG@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding locks statistics  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Adding locks statistics
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 06, 2026 at 03:19:57PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Now looking at it, and for the reason why 010 for concurrent indexes
> does not complain..

This one was a simple puzzle: there was a race condition between the
detach done by a local point and the wait/detach sequence.  As we want
a detach, dropping the local point is proving to work here.

I am going to do a few more runs to gain some more confidence.
Bertrand, could you confirm please?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding locks statistics
Next
From: lakshmi
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgbench: remove synchronous prepare