On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 07:18:33AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2026 at 11:10:54AM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
>> Would the right solution here be to try to have the ATTACH PARTITION check if
>> the parent index is not valid, then validatePartitionedIndex() ?
>
> This may be a backpatchable thing, even if it requires one to detach
> one partition before attaching it again, or attach a fake partition to
> force a flip of the flag, before detaching this fake partition.
Actually no. Yesterday I was looking at that from the angle of using
ALTER TABLE for the job, that requires a partition bound. Sami has
mentioned me that a repeated ALTER INDEX .. ATTACH PARTITION does not
fail when repeated, so we could just rely on that and enforce a
round of indisvalid across the partitioned index we are working on.
Could you write a patch? It would be better to have tests with
multiple levels, at least, with a partitioned table being a leaf of
another partitioned table. I am sure you get the picture, the point
being to recurse across multiple levels.
--
Michael
