On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 08:18:05AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> It looks like that aio_funcs.c does not need lock.h (reported by include-what-you-use).
> If we remove its direct include, it's still indirectly included through proc.h
> though. But I think that removing its direct include makes sense as it's not
> needed at all.
>
> If we still need to discuss about those lock.h related changes, maybe it's
> worth creating a dedicated thread?
This patch set is related to an entirely different topic than what we
are discussing, so yes, a different thread would be adapted.
--
Michael
