On 2020-10-21 15:54, lchch1990@sina.cn wrote:
> I think it's really a more convenient way to collect wal usage
> information,
> with it we can query when I want. Several points on my side:
Thanks for your comments.
> 1. It will be nice If you provide a chance to reset the information in
> WalStats,
> so that we can reset it without restart the database.
I agree.
Now, pg_stat_wal supports reset all informantion in WalStats
using pg_stat_reset_shared('wal') function.
Isn't it enough?
> 2. I think 'wal_write_backend' is mean wal write times happen in
> backends. The describe in document is not so clear, suggest rewrite
> it.
OK, I'll rewrite to "Total number of times backends write WAL data to
the disk".
> 3. I do not think it's a correct describe in document for
> 'wal_buffers_full'.
Where should I rewrite the description? If my understanding is not
correct, please let me know.
> 4. Quite strange to collect twice in XLogInsertRecord() for
> xl_tot_len,
> m_wal_records, m_wal_fpi.
Yes, Amit-san pointed me that too.
I'll remove them from pg_stat_wal since pg_stat_statements and vacuum
log
already shows the related statistics and there is a comment it's enough.
Anyway, if you need to the accumulated above statistics in pg_stat_wal,
please let me know.
> 5. I notice some code in issue_xlog_fsync() function to collect sync
> info,
> a standby may call the issue_xlog_fsync() too, which do not want to
> to collect this info. I think this need some change avoid run by
> standby
> side.
Thanks, I will fix it.
Regards,
--
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION
