Re: cluster index on a table - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Justin Pitts
Subject Re: cluster index on a table
Date
Msg-id ac116f9a0907151917o6d87d1a8wf3ff2afb088eb47c@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cluster index on a table  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Is there any interest in adding that (continual/automatic cluster
order maintenance) to a future release?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Scott Carey<scott@richrelevance.com> wrote:
> If you have a lot of insert/update/delete activity on a table fillfactor can
> help.
>
> I don’t believe that postgres will try and maintain the table in the cluster
> order however.
>
>
> On 7/15/09 8:04 AM, "Ibrahim Harrani" <ibrahim.harrani@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your suggestion.
> Is there any benefit of setting fillfactor to 70 or 80 on this table?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Scott Marlowe<scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> As another poster pointed out, you cluster on ONE index and one index
>> only.  However, you can cluster on a multi-column index.
>>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Wayne Conrad
Date:
Subject: Re: Poor overall performance unless regular VACUUM FULL
Next
From: Greenhorn
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency issue under very heay loads