Re: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE
Date
Msg-id abkR1aod9_dG-PGM@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE  (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> I've noticed another failure of the test from widowbird: [1]. But probably
> it's not related to f1e251be8 directly, as widowbird failed with a similar
> error before: [2]. I couldn't reproduce such failures yet, but keep
> trying in the background...
>
> [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=widowbird&dt=2026-03-16%2009%3A35%3A03
> [2] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=widowbird&dt=2025-10-25%2010%3A35%3A03

Thanks.  widowbird also uses "debug_parallel_query = regress", so it
really looks like to me that this is related to a parallel worker
spawning and messing with the database being renamed.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lukas Fittl
Date:
Subject: Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream