On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 10:16:58PM -0700, Haibo Yan wrote:
> I have not read the code yet, so this may already be answered there,
> but I had a question about the proposal itself. This patch protects
> against a missing backup_label, but what about a wrong one? If a
> user restores a backup_label file from a different backup, the
> existence check alone would not detect that. Do we need some
> consistency check between the returned pg_control copy and the
> backup_label contents, or is the intended scope here limited to the
> “missing file” case only?
Please note that we use bottom-posting on the lists, as of:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting
--
Michael
