Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream
Date
Msg-id abcv2M3BVzLYfdeq@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 10:39:40AM +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Michael, I had a similar idea in
> mind. I'll go ahead and implement these changes and come up with the
> new patches. Now since this is purely additive (new columns only), I'm
> thinking a single patch might suffice, Or maybe, we could split it
> into two: one that corrects the existing documentation and another
> that introduces the new fields for displaying downstream bytes sent
> and some other information related to this.

Thanks.  We'd better move forward quickly with this one based on the
current calendar, still it would be good to hear from Ashutosh Bapat
and double-check with him.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Change copyObject() to use typeof_unqual
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: gen_guc_tables improvements