On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 03:46:57PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am not sure if this is worth backpatching, so let's just use
> something like the attached on HEAD. This result cannot be NULL,
> historically it has always been an empty string.
Looking at the history of the tree, things like 46ab07ffda9d were
mentioned as worth a backpatch, so applied down to v14 for this one as
well.
--
Michael