Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Date
Msg-id abMR6MQGQyyKWep4@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread  (Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I'm debating whether I should move forward with committing this [0] for
v19.  On one hand, I think I've addressed all the latest feedback, and I'm
not aware of any sustained objections to the approach.  But on the other
hand, there hasn't been much discussion since November (my fault), and I
can't quite tell if this patch has enough support.  At the moment, I'm
leaning towards committing it, but I'm curious what folks think.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/attachment/191721/v11-0001-autovacuum-scheduling-improvements.patch

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Change initdb default to the builtin collation provider
Next
From: Bryan Green
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid multiple calls to memcpy (src/backend/access/index/genam.c)