On 2019-09-06 15:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 2019-09-01 23:34, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So did the old wording, it seemed to me. I'm happy to remove the sentence
>>> altogether if there's no reason to be pushing people away from MinGW.
>>> Should we also rethink the sentence I added at the top of the chapter,
>>> pointing Windows people to chapter 17?
>
>> Yeah, I suggest this:
>> ...
>
> Hm, I'm tempted to also drop the sentence about the "ready-made installer"
> then. It doesn't particularly belong here, and the only way to read it
> is as a nudge to not use the MinGW build process.
Agreed, it seems out of place there.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
