On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 04:31:37PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You are right, this needs to consider the pointer variable as
> volatile, as done in your patch, and not treat as volatile what is
> pointed at. This comes from 2e947217474c, as of HEAD. I'll take care
> of it later. The same business has been fixed in xml2 as of
> 93001888d85c.
Fixed as of 6307b096e259.
--
Michael