Re: Add expressions to pg_restore_extended_stats() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Add expressions to pg_restore_extended_stats()
Date
Msg-id aa4PKL1yBd_7VcsC@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add expressions to pg_restore_extended_stats()  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add expressions to pg_restore_extended_stats()
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 07, 2026 at 01:17:39AM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
> Fairly close +307, -603

Thanks for the patches.  I have tweaked a couple of comments, and
applied them after merging the whole together.  I have also spent the
time checking things by breaking some of the internal logic of the
restore functions, to see if diffs were correctly showing up.

One thing I was wondering is if the flat functions should call the
view, but at the end I guess that it does not matter much as long as
each query is grouped close to the other.  There is no need to expose
attrelid in the view, information we do not want to show in the type
of the view anyway.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid resource leak (src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dumpall.c)
Next
From: Mihail Nikalayeu
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative