Re: Test::More version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Test::More version
Date
Msg-id aa1ed125-83a6-ad89-fd03-be7e9d47c5a7@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Test::More version  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Test::More version
List pgsql-hackers
On 11.11.21 21:04, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> But I'd really like it if we could shift the goalposts a bit and require
> 0.96. subtests would be really nice to have available. Unfortunately I
> don't have any idea what versions of Test::More are actually in use.

My initial patch for TAP tests used subtests, and IIRC that was taken 
out because the Perl that comes with CentOS 6 is too old.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Should AT TIME ZONE be volatile?
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks