On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 07:08:17AM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> After thinking more on the subject I have come around. I think warning spam
> (that can be disabled) is fine and why not introduce it directly in 19?
WFM
> As for the patch itself I think it looks good, but I am not a fan of the
> test code. Why not simply write like the below?
>
> test_conn($node, 'user=md5_role', 'md5', 0,
> log_like =>
> [qr/connection authenticated: identity="md5_role" method=md5/],
> expected_stderr =>
> [qr/authenticated with an MD5-encrypted password/])
No good reason. I've updated the patch.
--
nathan
