On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 04:57:21PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> I will investigate this. However, please note that the current master
> includes the inlining commit (dc592a4155), which makes the COPY FROM
> faster. In my case,
>
> 1: current master without dc592a4155: 14400ms
> 2: current master: 13960ms (%3 improvement against #1)
> 3: current master + SIMD: 15123ms (%5 regression against #1 and %8
> regression against #2)
>
> Is it possible for you to do a similar test? I mean dropping
> dc592a4155 from the current master and re-running the benchmark, that
> would be helpful.
IMHO as long as the difference from v18 looks reasonable, commit-by-commit
regressions and improvements that even out in the end are okay. That's
perhaps a bit of mental gymnastics (e.g., what if we had committed the
inlining patch for v18?), but I believe that's how we've dealt with similar
problems in the past. But maybe there are ways to avoid even these
in-development regressions, too...
--
nathan
