On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 04:16:08PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> Right I see, I was talking about the similar case something like[1]
> but I see it already handles the conflict and generates a conflicting
> name if a constraint with the name already exists. So we are good,
> thanks.
I had this patch marked on my tablets for a lookup, with the hope that
it would have been possible to get something done for this week's
release, unfortunately I got drifted away and lacked time. I'll look
into what you have here.
--
Michael
