On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 01:02:08PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> My concern is more about the pattern: freeing the container
> structure while leaving its members allocated. That feels
> inconsistent and potentially confusing to readers. Either owning
> objects should be fully freed, or not freed at all, but partial
> freeing doesn’t seem like a great precedent. I’m not sure that’s a
> pattern we want to encourage in PG code.
For one-time allocations that are freed once we exit the binary, I
would not have bothered about freeing the state, TBH. Closing the fd
in these two paths is a good thing, though.
--
Michael
